BankableReal Bet? · The Electrolyser Teardown · one-page verdict

Which electrolyzer is the real bet?

There is no single winner. The real bet is the match — machine to power to site. Companion to the video episode; every number below traces to the cited research file.

Cheap · Flexible · Durable · Metal-light — every electrolyzer gives you three. None gives you all four.
MachineCAPEX $/kWFlexibilityStack lifeKey materialVerdict
Alkaline (AWE)
OH⁻ · liquid KOH · 60–90 °C
~$2,000 West
$750–1,300 China
modern 5–100%, ~10%/s;
classic floor ~20% (crossover)
60–90k h nickel — no PGM REAL BET
today's workhorse — firm, cost-first sites
PEM
H⁺ · solid acid membrane · 50–80 °C
~$2,400 West ~5% min load, sub-second;
most compact (1–6 A/cm²)
60–80k h iridium + platinum REAL BET
the flexible future — variable power, tight sites
Solid oxide (SOEC)
O²⁻ · hot ceramic · 600–850 °C
$2,000–3,000 (pilot) hates cycling (thermal inertia) ~20k h demo ceramics + nickel — no PGM WATCH
80–90% efficient — needs cheap heat + durability
AEM
OH⁻ · solid alkaline membrane · 40–60 °C
early stage aims PEM-like (0.2 A/cm² today) ~1,000 h proven Ni/Co — no PGM NOT YET
highest upside, least proven — track it

Sources: IEA Global Hydrogen Review 2025 · World Bank electrolyser report · Kiemel et al. IJHE (iridium: ~8 t/yr, ~90% South Africa; loadings 2 g/kW → 0.3 → 0.05) · IJHE 2025 SOEC · Ammonia Energy Assn AEM status · RSER dynamic-operation review · Applied Energy 2024 · S&P Global / Hydrogen Insight (Sinopec Kuqa ~20% utilization). Full [S#] mapping in the workbook's Sources sheet.

Read the site, then choose the configuration

Bankable — which hard-tech bets actually pencil out. The editable comparison workbook (matrix + site matcher) came with this download; the video is at bankable.show.

Prepared from public data by an engineer with over a decade commercializing first-of-a-kind energy technology. Illustrative, not project-grade engineering. We judge technologies, never stocks; nothing here is investment advice. Advisory: hello@bankable.show